Sunday, February 19, 2017

DOT clarification: Revision of Pension of pre-2006 pensioners-delinking of revised pension from qualifying service of 33 yrs


Application Form for Family Pension on Death of a Government Servant or Pensioner or on death or Ineligibility of Family Pensioners

Application Form for Family Pension on Death of a Government Servant or Pensioner or on death or Ineligibility of Family Pensioners: Form of Application for Family Pension on Death of a Government Servant or Pensioner or on death or Ineligibility of Family Pensioners

WB POs nt paying pension.Pensioners crying 4 help no one listening

Deplorable Condition of Rly medical Services on NF Rly




Functioning of Various Potals/Forums Provided for Representing Pensioner’s Grievances - Casual approach by administrative Officers especially those in Railways



Saturday, February 18, 2017

BEWARE private hospitals reuse disposables

Private hospitals reuse disposables, make you pay for them http://toi.in/_OXvLb/a19li
Private hospitals reuse disposables, make you pay for them
http://toi.in/_OXvLb/a19li

Challenge of ageing with dignity

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/challenge-of-ageing-with-dignity/article17326492.ece

India’s rapidly ageing population may soon outweigh the demographic dividend of a young workforce. Unless attitudes towards the elderly improve and the government increases resources for their care, India is staring at the prospect of a generational socioeconomic crisis. This is the first of a four-part series

The New Life Home for senior citizens in Krishnagiri is a refuge for those among the elderly who have run out of options in life.
Govindammal (75), was rescued less than two kilometres from the home, from a cattle pen on a tiny plot of land owned by her son and daughter-in-law. “We found her emaciated. We doubted if she would survive then,” said Uma Maheshwari, a supervisor at the home.
During the first four months after Govindammal moved in, her daughter-in-law visited once a month to collect her old age pension of Rs. 1,000. But soon, when her pensions stopped coming in, so too did those purposeful visits.
“At least she came, the son never visited once,” says Ms.Maheshwari.
In another the corner of the home, 80-year-old Velu Chettiar was busy wrapping home-made semiya in small packets. He would go out and sell them door-to-door, making Rs.2 for every packet that he sold for Rs.10.
The supervisors fondly call him the “semiya thatha.” Velu Chettiar’s story though, is riven with harsh realities: he walked out on his sons after being slighted by them, is all he will reveal. The volunteers from the home found him packing semiya under a candle light in the bus stand. “I wasn’t given food, and I wasn’t allowed to sell semiya too. So, I got out,” Velu Chettiar says, with pride.

Ageing population

These are common stories among the growing cohort of elderly Indians, even more so among the destitute population. While India still has a demographic distribution that is still relatively skewed toward the youth, compared to developed countries, its population is ageing fast.
By some estimates approximately 20% of Indians will be elderly by 2050, defined as aged 60 years and above, marking a dramatic jump from the 6% level that the figure is at now.
Combined with the fact that we already have the second largest elderly population in the world, such projections beg the question of how the country’s nascent infrastructure and traditional social values will cope with the enormous stress that is likely to come from the need to provide for our senior citizens’ welfare.
In a sense our attitudes toward the elderly, which in many cases deny them a life of dignity in their twilight years, pose as much a challenge as the economic conundrums of ensuring they receive quality healthcare and accommodation.
Those who move from the world of active work to a retired life, often with dependencies upon family members, face numerous uncertainties and sometimes a harsh reality of deprivation.
Among them, senior citizens fortunate enough to have worked in the organised sector receive pension and other retirement benefits after retiring at between 60 and 65 years of age, yet for the others the only succour is the nominal old-age pension coverage provided by the Government of India and State Governments.

Govt. interventions

Among these the Central Government has since 1992 been implementing its Integrated Programme for Older Persons, which aims to provide senior citizens with basic amenities such as shelter, food, medical care and entertainment opportunities.
Perhaps the most relevant policy for the poorer sections amongst the elderly is the Ministry of Rural Development’s Indira Gandhi Old Age Pension Scheme. This ensures for below poverty line households, a monthly pension of Rs.200 is given for each person in the age group of 60-79 years and Rs. 500 for those above 80 years and above.
Various other Government of India ministries offer concessions and similar schemes that promote access to resources by the elderly, including the Ministries of Health and Family Welfare, Finance, and Departments of Revenue, Railways, and Civil Aviation. While most of these initiatives look good on paper, reality can sometimes be less encouraging. In the Krishnagiri home around 11 of the 13 women and men in New Life home were rescued from within a 3-kilometer radius of the main town, yet there is not one government run home in the district.
Gender differences can also cut both ways among the elderly in India. At the New Life Home Malliga, a volunteer, says that in many families the younger generation seems inclined to keep elderly mothers at home to take care of the grandchildren or do household chores; yet they are less inclined to keep fathers.
Paradoxically, women sometimes end up worse off because in many of the patriarchal-patrilineal families especially in rural areas, the responsibility for care and nurture falls to the women of the family, which in turn has cast women both as victims and perpetrators of abandonment. As long as women’s leisure-less labour freed men of any such responsibility towards aged members of the household, men’s workplaces and the government establishment could afford to plod on in the same patriarchal modes.
Yet as women’s roles have in recent years expanded outside of home-making there has not been an accompanying recognition that men would now have to play a larger role in caring for the aged than they used to, and that men’s workplaces and the government subsidy systems would have to do more to support this.

Changing attitudes

Looking beyond these structural factors, an attitudinal shift may be necessary to mitigate the neglect, abuse and violence faced by the elderly in India.
These usually stem from the perception of senior citizens as not deserving of respect and dignity, as vulnerable targets for predation for financial or other needs, or simply as a burden that can be shrugged off.
This is particularly true in rural India. In Krishnagiri income insecurity, migration and displacement for work, smaller tenements, and lack of tangible State social security infrastructure seemed to be feeding into a collective compassion deficit.
While accounts of neglect varied there, it was evident that many among the elderly yearned for families and to play a role in their lives by way of care and nurture for their grandchildren. Others hoped to lead lives that offered respect and independence, and wanted to get away when it was denied.
From a policy perspective it remains a concern that the framing of state intervention for senior citizens in terms of familial care and neglect results in the exclusion of destitute persons.
“The State sees them as destitutes, beggars and not as senior citizens who were abandoned and in need of care.” says Revathi Mohan, the trustee of Narendra Nambikkai Natchathiram, an integrated home for children and destitute old women in Hosur, about 57 kilometers from Krishnagiri. Hence, these government-supported homes are not encouraged to rescue the poor among the elderly, who inevitably get pushed to beggary on the streets.

Friday, February 17, 2017

Grant of Advances – Seventh Central Pay Commission recommendations – Amendment to rules on computer Advance to Railway Servants


Government of India (Bharat Sarkar)
Ministry of Railways (Rail Mantralaya)
(Railway Board)

No.I/11-Part I
PC-VII No.: 15/2017
RBE No. 10/2017

No.F(E)Spl./2016/ADV.4/1(7th CPC)

New Delhi, Dated: 07-02-2017

The General Managers and FA&CAOs
All Indian Railways & Production Units
(As per standard List)

Subject: Grant of Advances – Seventh Central Pay Commission recommendations – Amendment to rules on computer Advance to Railway Servants.
Consequent upon the decision taken by the Government on the recommendations of Seventh Central Pay Commission, the Ministry of Finance vide their OM No.12(1)E.II(A)/2016 dated 07.10.2016  have amended the eligibility criteria in the existing provisions relating to the grant of personal Computer Advance.

2. Amendment conditions of grant of Computer Advance are as follows:

AdvanceQuantumEligibility Criteria
Personal Computer Advance₹ 50,000/- or actual price of PC, whichever is lower.All Government Servants
The Computer Advance will be allowed maximum five times in the entire service
The other terms and conditions governing the grant of personal computer advance shall remain unchanged.

3. Further, Ministry of Finance in their ibid OM have also decided that the other interest bearing advances relating to Motor Car Advance and Motorcycle/Scooter/Moped Advance will stand discontinued.

4. The above mentioned OM of Ministry of Finance relating to grant of Interest bearing advances will apply mutatis – mutandis to Railway employees also.

4.1 So far as the interest free advances are concerned, Bicycle and warm clothing advances stands abolished for Railway employees also in terms of MoF’s decision.

4.2 Orders relating to other interest free advances will be issued separately separately by concerned Directorates.

5. Necessary/Advance Correction slip to the chapter XI of the Indian Railway Establishment Manual, Vol.I Revised Edition, 1989 will follow.

6. The revised orders are effective from 07.10.2016 i.e the date of the issue of the aforesaid OM of the Ministry of Finance. Past Cases where the advances have already been sanctioned under the provisions of earlier rules on the subject need not be reopened.

7. Please acknowledge receipt.

8. Hindi version will follow.

(A.C.Jain)
Dy.Director Finance (Estt.)
Railway Board.

Option -1 for Pre-2016 Pensioners Rejected – Confederation

Option -1 for Pre-2016 Pensioners Rejected – Confederation

OPTION – I FOR PRE-2016 PENSIONERS REJECTED: In the meeting held on 30-06-2016, with Group of Ministers by JCM staff side, the Finance Minister had also clarified that Government has taken the decision to implement the recommendation of 7th CPC to bring about parity between past and present pensioners. (Vide NJCA Statement issued on 06-07-2016). Finance Minister categorically assured the NJCA leaders on 30-06-2016 that the Government has accepted the recommendation in toto and Pension department has only been asked to sort out the difficulties in implementation of Option-I, if any.

NJCA wrote to Finance Minister on 16-07-2016, as follows: “The issue of acceptance of Option-I and II was discussed with your goodself at the residence of Hon’ble Home Minister (Govt. of India) wherein Hon’ble Minister for Railways and Hon’ble MoS Railways were present. You had categorically agreed our demand that no dilution would be made in the options given to the Pensioners by the 7th CPC. It is unfortunate that a rider “subject to feasibility” has been imposed on Option-I. Sir, this is very unfair and we will appreciate, if you kindly get the sentence “subject to feasibility” removed from that order, to keep your promise also”.

But, Finance Minister had gone back from his assurance to JCM Staff side leaders and he refused to withdraw the condition “subject to feasibility”. In the letter dated 17-10-2016, addressed to Chairman of the “Pension Option-I Committee”, the Secretary, JCM staff side requested as follows:

“The attempt therefore must be to explore the ways and means of implementing the said recommendation which is beneficial to a large number of pensioners, especially those retired prior to 1996. In view of this, the staff side is of the firm view that the Government issue orders for implementation of Option-I as there is no room for stating that the recommendation is impossible to be implemented for those who are benefitted by the said option”.

Finally NJCA wrote a letter to Hon’ble Home Minister Shri. Rajnath Singh on 17-01-2017, requesting intervention. The letter reads as follows:

“The Central Government Pensioners numbering presently more than the working employees are aggrieved of the fact that the one and the only recommendation of the 7th CPC which was in their favour ie; Option-I have been recommended to be rejected by the Pension Department to the Government”.

Inspite of all these, the proposal is submitted to cabinet to reject Option-I. This underlines the fact that unless NJCA revive its deferred indefinite strike, the Government will not allow Option-I to pensioners, as assured by Finance Minister.

29th SCOVA meeting under the chairmanship of Honorable MOS(PP) - Minutes of the meeting